Method and system for incorporating an emission sensor into a gas tubine controller

ABSTRACT

A method for determining an estimated operating parameter for a gas turbine including the steps of: determining an estimated operating parameter using an algorithm have an input from a sensor, wherein the algorithm includes a trim factor; determining a first trim factor based on a comparison of the first estimated operating parameter and the output of the sensor when a condition of the sensor is in a first mode, and during a subsequent determination of the estimated operating parameter, applying the first trim factor to subsequently determine the estimated operating condition if the condition of second sensor is in a second mode.

CROSS RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 10/712,991 filed Nov. 17, 2003.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to controllers for a combustionsystem for a gas turbine. In particular, the invention relates to acombustor control algorithm for a Dry Low NOx (DLN) combustor.

Industrial and power generation gas turbines have control systems(“controllers”) that monitor and control their operation. Thesecontrollers govern the combustion system of the gas turbine. To minimizeemissions of carbon-monoxide and nitric-oxides (NOx), DLN combustionsystems may include control scheduling algorithms that receive as inputsmeasurements of the exhaust temperature of the turbine, the actualoperating compressor pressure ratio, and the actual emissions levels.

Emissions sensors are needed to monitor emission levels in the turbineexhaust. Industrial gas turbine engine control systems generally employtriplex redundancy for control process and safety critical sensors.Triplex redundancy is often needed to satisfy safety and reliabilityexpectations and requirements of customers and governmental agencies.Providing three emission sensors for a turbine exhaust is expensive, andadds to the maintenance and calibration requirements of the gas turbine.There is a need for a cost effective approach to directly controllingemission levels in a gas turbine.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention may be embodied as a method for determining an estimatedoperating parameter for a gas turbine including the steps of:determining an estimated operating parameter using an algorithm have aninput from a sensor, wherein the algorithm includes a trim factor;determining a first trim factor based on a comparison of the firstestimated operating parameter and the output of the sensor when acondition of the sensor is in a first mode, and during a subsequentdetermination of the estimated operating parameter, applying the firsttrim factor to subsequently determine the estimated operating conditionif the condition of second sensor is in a second mode.

The invention may also be embodied as a method for determining anestimated operating emission level in the exhaust stream of a gasturbine comprising: periodically determining an estimated emission levelfrom an output of emissions transfer algorithm, wherein said algorithmincludes a trim factor; determining a current trim factor based on aratio of a current output of a healthy emission sensor monitoring theexhaust and of the estimated emission level from a prior determination,and applying a prior trim factor previously applied to determine theestimated operating condition if the emission sensor is unhealthy.

The invention may be further embodied as a system for determining anestimated operating parameter for a gas turbine having an exhaust and afuel controller comprising: a controller including a processor executinga combustion temperature scheduling algorithm and emissions transferfunction stored in electronic memory of the controller, wherein saidscheduling algorithm outputs a temperature request signal applied togenerate a fuel control command for said fuel controller and saidscheduling algorithm receives as an input a trim factor based on anestimated emission level generated by the emissions transfer function,wherein said emissions transfer function includes a emissions correctionfactor; a emission sensor measuring a emission level in the exhaust,wherein said sensor has an operating mode and a suspended mode; a trimfactor switch selectively operating said sensor in said modes, whereinsaid switch selects a current emissions correction factor or a prioremissions correction factor to be applied to the emissions transferfunction on a sensor condition input signal applied to the switch.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings in conjunction with the text of thisspecification describe an embodiment(s) of the invention.

FIG. 1 is a schematic depiction of a gas turbine having a fuel controlsystem.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an emission limiting system including aclosed-loop control temperature scheduling algorithm to trim a referenceexhaust temperature request applied to control the gas turbine.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a conventional emissions-trim temperaturescheduling algorithm.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a emissions-trim temperature schedulingalgorithm having a emission model-based trim factor.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 depicts a gas turbine 10 having a compressor 12, combustor 14,turbine 16 drivingly coupled to the compressor and a control system 18.An inlet duct 20 to the compressor feeds ambient air and possiblyinjected water to inlet guide vanes (IGVs) 28 and to the compressor. Theturbine may drive a generator 22 to produce electrical power.

The operation of the gas turbine may be monitored by several sensors 24detecting various conditions of the turbine, generator and environment.For example, temperature sensors may monitor compressor dischargetemperature, turbine exhaust gas temperature, and other temperaturemeasurements of the gas stream through the gas turbine. Pressure sensorsmay monitor static and dynamic pressure levels at the compressor inletand outlet, and turbine exhaust, as well as at other locations in thegas stream. The sensors 24 may also comprise flow sensors, speedsensors, flame detector sensors, valve position sensors, guide vaneangle sensors, or the like that sense various parameters pertinent tothe operation of gas turbine 10. Typically, pressure, temperature, flow,speed, IGV and many other sensors on a gas turbine are extremelyreliable, require infrequent calibration and maintenance and areinexpensive, at least as compared to some of the more recent emissionsensors that are available for monitoring emissions. As used herein,“parameters” and similar terms refer to items that can be used to definethe operating conditions of turbine, such as temperatures, pressures,and flows at defined locations in the turbine that can be used torepresent a given turbine operating condition.

The controller may be a General Electric SPEEDTRONIC™ Gas TurbineControl System, such as is described in Rowen, W. I., “SPEEDTRONIC™ MarkV Gas Turbine Control System”, GE-3658D, published by GE Industrial &Power Systems of Schenectady, N.Y. The controller 18 may be a computersystem having a processor(s) that executes programs to control theoperation of the gas turbine using sensor inputs and instructions fromhuman operators. The programs executed by the controller 18 may includescheduling algorithms for regulating fuel flow to the combustor 14 andthe angle of the inlet guide vanes (IGV). The commands generated by thecontroller cause a fuel controller 27 on the gas turbine to, forexample, adjust valves 31 between the fuel supply and combustors thatregulate the flow and type of fuel, and actuators 29 to adjust the angleof the IGVs 28 on the compressor.

The controller 18 regulates the gas turbine based, in part, onalgorithms stored in computer memory of the controller. These algorithmsenable the controller 18 to maintain the NOx and CO emissions in theturbine exhaust to within certain predefined limits, and to maintain thecombustor firing temperature to within predefined temperature limits.The combustor 14 may be a DLN combustion system. The control system 18may be programmed and modified to control the DLN combustion system.

Gas turbine engines with ultra-low emissions combustors, e.g., DLNcombustion systems, require precise control so that the turbine gasemissions are within limits established by the turbine manufacturer, andto ensure that the gas turbine operates within certain operabilityboundaries, e.g., lean blowout, combustion dynamics, and otherparameters. Control systems for ultra-low emission combustors generallyrequire highly accurate and calibrated emission sensors. In the past,calibration of these sensors required field service engineers toregularly adjust settings on the controller and emissions sensors toaccommodate changes in the operation of the gas turbine due to wear andother conditions.

Conventional closed-loop systems employ emission sensors to measureemissions levels in the turbine exhaust and provide feedback data usedby control algorithms. For example, emissions sensors at the turbineexhaust provide data on current emissions levels that is applied indetermining a turbine exhaust temperature request. Emissions sensors areexpensive, have relatively large processing delay (on the order ofminutes), can be unreliable, and generally require frequent calibrationand maintenance. The expense, delay, reliability, maintenance, andcalibration issues associated with emissions sensing equipment poseunique problems for a closed-loop approach.

Operation of an industrial gas turbine engine requires the controlsystem to set the total fuel flow, compressor inlet guide vane (IGV),inlet bleed heat (IBH), and combustor fuel splits to achieve the desiredcycle match point (i.e. generate the desired output and heat-rate whileobserving operational boundaries). Total fuel flow and IGV position aredominant effectors in achieving the desired result. A typical part-loadcontrol mode involves setting fuel flow and the IGV angle to satisfy theload (generator output) request, and to observe an exhaust temperatureprofile (temperature control curve). When base-load operation isachieved, the IGV is typically at an angle of maximum physical limit. Atbase-load, fuel flow alone is generally adjusted to observe an exhausttemperature profile needed to satisfy emission limits and other gasturbine operating limits.

FIG. 2 shows a high-level block diagram of an exhaust temperaturecontroller 30. At this high level, the controller appears as aconventional exhaust temperature controller. Sensors and surrogates areprovided to a temperature scheduling algorithm 32 to define an exhausttemperature request 34.

The temperature scheduling algorithm 32 receives input signals regardingthe operation conditions of the gas turbine directly from sensors andfrom surrogates. Sensor signals provide data regarding parameters of thegas turbine that are directly monitored by the sensors. For example,temperature and pressure sensors may directly measure the temperaturesand pressures at the gas turbine inlet, at various stages of thecompressor and at the turbine exhaust. Similarly, speed sensors maymeasure the rotational speed of the gas turbine and flow sensors maymeasure the fuel flow into the combustor. Surrogates are parameters ofthe gas turbine that are not directly sensed, but are rather parametersdetermined based on algorithms and correlations based on sensor dataregarding other operating conditions.

The exhaust temperature request 34 is compared to an actual exhausttemperature level 36 to generate a difference signal 38 that is appliedto a proportional integral compensation unit 40 which generates controlvalues for operating the gas turbine. The control values may be inletguide vane (IGV) settings and fuel settings that are applied to adjustthe IGVs and to the fuel controller for the combustor of the gasturbine. The proportional integral compensation unit may beconventional.

FIG. 3 depicts a conventional emissions-trim temperature schedulingalgorithm 42 that includes a emissions trim function (49, 50 and 52). Areference exhaust temperature 41 is determined based on the compressorpressure ratio (CPR) and a graph, look-up table or other correlation 46that converts the CPR to the reference exhaust temperature 41. Thereference exhaust temperature 41 is trimmed (added to or subtractedfrom) by an output of a proportional plus integral (P+I) compensationalgorithm 48 that outputs a trim value 47 to be summed with thereference exhaust temperature 44. The trim value 47 is determined by theP+I unit based on a emission error value 49 which is a differencebetween a target emission value 50 and a sensed emission level 52 thatis measured by emissions sensors 54, e.g., NOx sensors. Given the needfor triple redundancy in critical components, three emissions sensors 54are employed in a conventional emissions-trim temperature schedulingalgorithm.

The trimmed reference exhaust temperature 44 is compared to a maximumallowable exhaust temperature in a minimum check algorithm 56 generatean exhaust temperature request 58. The difference 60 between thereference exhaust temperature 44 and the exhaust temperature request 58is used to reset the integral part of the P+I unit 48 to guard againstintegrator wind-up.

Generally, the emissions trim function has only limited authority toguard against sensor failure or extreme sensor drift. If the emissionssensors fail or become uncalibrated, the emissions control system maybecome disabled. Industrial gas turbine engine control systems generallyemploy triplex redundancy for control process and safety criticalsensors. Triplex redundancy is often needed to satisfy safety andreliability expectations and requirements of customers and governmentalagencies. Providing three emission sensors 54 for a turbine exhaust canbe extremely expensive, and increase the maintenance requirements of thegas turbine.

If a closed-loop control system for emission could be relieved of therequirement for triple redundancy in sensor signals and only a singleemissions sensor employed, then significant product cost could beavoided and the maintenance requirements reduced. However, employing anemissions sensor in a conventional closed-loop fashion places asignificant system safety and reliability burden on that sensor.

The processing delay inherent with stat-of-the-art emissions sensingequipment is typically on the order of several minutes. Emissionscompliance requirements will typically allow short periods ofnon-compliance (on the order of seconds), but not significant periods ofnon-compliance. The time delay associated with emissions sensingequipment is such that the sole reliance on the sensor is not sufficientto ensure compliance when operational and environmental conditions arechanging.

Emissions sensors 54 must be regularly maintained to ensure that theyare operating properly and that emission levels do not exceed allowablelimits. In particular, emissions sensing equipment requires frequentcalibration to ensure accuracy in emission measurements. Sensor drift isusually caused by changes in ambient temperature. If only a singlesensor is employed in the control system shown in FIG. 3, then specialoperational restrictions would necessarily be placed on the gas turbinewhile the sensor was being calibrated. Such operational restrictionswould be required to avoid violation of gas system operabilityboundaries, and would have a negative impact on the continuous operationof the gas turbine. Where there is a single emission sensor failure ofthat one sensor can result in the benign problems (such asnon-compliance with emissions requirements, slight over or under-fire)and serious problems (blow-out, trip, failure). A method is needed toreduce the cost of closed-loop control of emissions that does notsacrifice system safety and reliability, and does not impose operationalrestrictions on the operation of the gas turbine.

FIG. 4 depicts a closed loop, model-based emissions-trim temperaturescheduling algorithm 70 that generates an estimated emission level 72that is applied to trim 47 an exhaust temperature request 41. Theestimated emission level 72 is used instead of the sensed emission level52 of the conventional system shown in FIG. 3. In the emissionsmodel-based algorithm, the closure of the emission control system 70 isperformed on an estimated emissions level 72 that is the output of aphysics-based emissions transfer function 74. The emissions transferfunction 74 receives as inputs data from sensors and surrogates, suchas, compressor discharge temperature, specific humidity of ambient air,fuel split ratio and firing temperature. The transfer function 74 modelsthe relationship between emissions and the cycle match point of the gasturbine. The sensors 24 used to generate the sensor data and thesurrogates data for the emissions transfer function may be conventionalsensors, e.g., temperature pressure and specific humidity sensors, thatare typically used with a gas turbine and which are typically tripleredundant.

The emissions transfer function 74 is tuned (K) to match a sensedemission level 76, when the emissions sensor 78 is deemed to be“healthy.” The correction factor (K) that is applied to the emissionstransfer function to adjust the estimated emission level 72. Thecorrection factor (K) is determined from a comparison, e.g., ratio, ofthe estimated emissions value 72 to a sensed emissions value 76. In theexample shown here, the correction factor (K) is a ratio of theestimated emissions value for a preceding determination (Z⁻¹) by theemissions transfer function 74 and the sensed emissions value 76. Theemissions transfer function 74 determines the estimated emissions level72 periodically, such as every compute cycle of the controller (40 ms).

A correction factor (K) of 1.0 indicates that the estimated emissionsand sensed emissions values are the same. The extent to which thecorrection factor K is smaller or greater than 1.0 indicates the extentto which the estimated emissions value differs from the sensed emissionsvalue. The correction factor need not be a ratio. It may be a differencebetween the estimated and sensed emissions values, or determined by alook-up table or function. For example, further, the correction factor(K) need not be a constant, but may be vary exponentially or a functionof another parameter. There may be multiple correction factors appliedto the emissions transfer function based on a multitude of accumulateddata.

A sensor condition signal 80 is provided that indicates whether theemissions sensor 78 is “healthy” or “unhealthy”. A healthy emissionssensor may be a sensor that is operating within an expected range and isnot undergoing calibration. The conditions for which a sensor is deemedhealthy may be determined for each gas turbine or class of gas turbines.For example, the sensor condition signal may be set to “healthy” if thesensor is not currently undergoing maintenance and calibration, the gasturbine has not recently changed its operating conditions, and thesensor is operating within the expected range. The sensor 78 may be asingle NOx emissions sensor and the transfer function 74 may predict aNOx emissions level.

When the sensor 78 is deemed to be un-healthy, the tuning process isswitched 82 (F) to suspend the emissions sensor and apply a previousvalue 84 (Z⁻¹ of K) of the correction factor (K). This previous K-valueis maintained until sensor health is restored. The switch 82 determineswhether the correction factor (K) is a prior K-value 84 or a valuedetermined from the actual emission level currently sensed by theemissions sensor 78. The switch 82 may also suspend the operation of theemissions sensor, while a prior K-value us applied to the emissionstransfer function 74.

The prior value 84 of K is repeatedly used as the correction factor forthe trim temperature function 70 until the switch 82 is reset by asignal 80 that the sensor is healthy. The switch 82 may hold theemissions sensor 78 in an suspended mode during steady state operationof the gas turbine and while ambient conditions, e.g., specific humidityremain relatively constant; while the emissions sensor is beingcalibrated, and while the sensor is producing out of range levels. Bysuspending emission sensing during extended periods of gas turbineoperation, the emissions sensor 78 requires less frequent maintenanceand calibration and the amount of wear on the sensor is reduced.

The model-based approach reduces the emission system dependency on thesingle emissions sensor 78 by only periodically using the sensor to tunethe correction factor (K). At other times, the same correction factor 84is reused by the control-resident physics-based emissions transferfunction 74. The correction factor (K) may be applied (while the switchis set to F) even if the emissions sensor 78 has failed or is out ofcalibration. The use of an estimated emission level and a correctionfactor (K) that is periodically tuned using a emissions sensor maintainsthe overall gas turbine system safety and reliability, whilesimultaneously providing relief from the need for triple redundantemissions sensors. The dependency on redundant sensors is shifted toexisting triple redundant gas turbine sensors, e.g., compressordischarge temperature (TCD), compressor discharge pressure (PCD),temperature sensors (Tx), and output power sensors. With the model-basedapproach for the emission level, the need is lessened to imposeoperational restrictions to accommodate emissions sensor calibration is,and there is less risk of gas turbine operating limit boundaryviolations resulting from emissions sensor failures.

While the invention has been described in connection with what ispresently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment,it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to thedisclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover variousmodifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit andscope of the appended claims.

1. A system for determining an estimated operating parameter for a gasturbine having an exhaust and a fuel controller comprising: a controllerincluding a processor executing a combustion temperature schedulingalgorithm and an emissions transfer function stored in electronic memoryof the controller, wherein said scheduling algorithm outputs atemperature request signal applied to generate a fuel control commandfor said fuel controller and said scheduling algorithm receives as aninput an emissions trim factor based on an estimated emission levelgenerated by the emissions transfer function; an emission sensormeasuring an emission level in the exhaust, wherein said sensor has anoperating mode and a suspended mode, and an emissions trim factor switchselectively applying to the emissions transfer function a currentemissions correction factor when said sensor is in the operating modeand a prior emissions correction factor when the sensor is in thesuspended mode.
 2. A system as in claim 1 wherein the emissionscorrection factor is a ratio of a prior estimated operating parameterand a current output of the sensor.
 3. A system as in claim 1 whereinsaid emission sensor is a single sensor.
 4. A system as in claim 1wherein said emission sensor is healthy during the operating mode.
 5. Asystem as in claim 1 wherein said emission sensor is placed in thesuspended mode when said sensor is operating outside of a predeterminedrange.
 6. A system as in claim 1 wherein said emission sensor issuspended during a period of steady state gas turbine operation andafter the estimated emission level is determined while said gas turbinefor said steady state operation.
 7. A system as in claim 1 wherein theemission sensor is a nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission sensor.
 8. A systemas in claim 1 wherein the prior emissions correction factor is apreceding prior emissions correction factor.
 9. A system for determiningan estimated operating parameter for a gas turbine comprising: acontroller including a processor executing a gas turbine controlscheduling algorithm and an emissions transfer function stored inelectronic memory of the controller, wherein said scheduling algorithmoutputs a turbine condition request signal applied to generate a controlcommand for said gas turbine and said scheduling algorithm receives asan input an emissions trim factor based on an estimated emission levelgenerated by the emissions transfer function; an emission sensormeasuring an emission level in the exhaust, wherein said sensor has anoperating mode and a suspended mode, and an emissions trim factor switchselectively applying to the emissions transfer function a currentemissions correction factor when said sensor is in the operating modeand a prior emissions correction factor when the sensor is in thesuspended mode.
 10. A system as in claim 9 wherein the emissionscorrection factor is a ratio of a prior estimated operating parameterand a current output of the sensor.
 11. A system as in claim 9 whereinsaid emission sensor is placed in the suspended mode when said sensor isoperating outside of a predetermined range.
 12. A system as in claim 9wherein said emission sensor is suspended during a period of steadystate gas turbine operation and after the estimated emission level isdetermined while said gas turbine for said steady state operation.
 13. Asystem as in claim 9 wherein the emission sensor is a nitrogen oxide(NOx) emission sensor.
 14. A system as in claim 9 wherein the prioremissions correction factor is a preceding prior emissions correctionfactor.
 15. A method for determining an estimated operating parameterfor a gas turbine having an exhaust and a fuel controller wherein thecontroller includes a processor executing a combustion temperaturescheduling algorithm and emissions transfer function stored inelectronic memory of the controller, said method comprising: outputtinga temperature request signal by the scheduling algorithm to generate afuel control command for said fuel controller; receiving by thescheduling algorithm an emissions trim factor based on an estimatedemission level generated by the emissions transfer function, whereinsaid emissions transfer function includes a emissions correction factor;measuring a emission level by an emission sensor in the exhaust, whereinsaid sensor has an operating mode and a suspended mode; using theemission level measured by the emission sensor to generate a currentemissions correction factor; selectively switching the sensor betweensaid modes, wherein the current emissions correction factor is selectedwhen said sensor is in the operating mode and a prior emissionscorrection factor is selected when the sensor is in the suspended mode.16. The method of claim 15 wherein the current emissions correctionfactor is a ratio of a prior estimated operating parameter and a currentoutput of the sensor.
 17. The method of claim 15 wherein said emissionsensor is a single sensor and said sensor does not measure the emissionlevel when in the suspended mode.
 18. The method of claim 15 whereinsaid emission sensor is operating within a predetermined range of sensoroutputs during the operating mode.
 19. The method of claim 15 whereinsaid emission sensor is placed in the suspended mode while said sensoris operating outside of a predetermined range.
 20. The method of claim15 wherein said emission sensor is placed in the suspended mode whensaid sensor is operating outside of a predetermined range.